/****** Font Awesome ******/ /****** Collapsing Nested Menu Items | Code by Elegant Themes ******/

YEAR 1 CURRICULUM

*Year 1 modules span a duration of 3-7 weeks.

MODULE 1:

Intensive Intervention: What is It and Why is It Important?

Learning Objectives:

  • Evaluate current outcomes for students with disabilities in U.S. schools and generate a hypothesis regarding the cause of these outcomes.
  • Describe the characteristics of students with disabilities who have demonstrated poor response to current remediation efforts.
  • Define “intensive intervention” and distinguish key features that differentiate this approach from instruction provided in Tiers 1 and 2.
  • Generate an argument to support the need for intensive intervention, including a hypothesis regarding why intensive intervention may lead to improved outcomes for students with disabilities.

MODULE 2:

The Taxonomy of Intervention Intensity: A Framework for Designing and Conducting Intensive Intervention

Learning Objectives:

  • Scholars will explain the purpose and importance of the Taxonomy of Intervention Intensity.
  • Scholars will articulate how Tier 2 and intensive intervention differ.
  • Scholars will explain how to integrate an intervention platform, a progress-monitoring system, and the data-based individualization process to tailor intervention to meet the reading, math, and behavioral needs of intensive intervention students.

MODULE 3:

Progress Monitoring in Intensive Intervention

Learning objectives:

  • Define general outcomes measurement and specific subskill mastery measurement; identify their strengths and limitations, and how they can be applied to measure academic skills and behavior.
  • Describe the core features of DBI, and outline its use for academic skills and behavior.
  • Describe how progress monitoring in academic skills and behavior can work together to inform intervention for students with co-occurring difficulties.
  • Describe situations in which general outcomes measurement, specific subskill mastery measurement, or both would be beneficial.
  • Describe how a formative assessment approach might be applied to various situations such as instruction for students with low-incidence disabilities and interventions in early childhood.

MODULE 4:

Using Single-Case Design to Evaluate Response to Intensification

Learning Objectives:

  • Scholars will differentiate between science-based and non-science-based educational research.

  • Scholars will learn about the principles of experimental design and singe-case research.

  • Scholars will learn about the most common designs used in special education research.

  • Scholars will read single-case research that includes academic and behavioral outcomes.

  • Scholars will explain why single-case research is important for investigating effective practices for students with intensive and comorbid needs.

MODULE 5:

Explicit Instruction

Learning Objectives:

  • Identify elements of an explicit instruction framework

  • Generate intervention materials that include the elements of explicit instruction that could be used to teach students with difficulties or disabilities

  • Explain how the elements of explicit instruction can be utilized in your areas of comorbidity 

MODULE 6:

Synthesis of Intensive Intervention Approaches

Learning Objectives:

  • Scholars will synthesize what they have learned thus far by identifying key components related to intensifying intervention. 
  • Through a collaborative writing process, scholars will identify a practice, program, or intervention for students with CLBD and produce an Intensive Intervention Practice Guide that summarizes current evidence and provides implementation information designed for practitioners. 
  • Scholars will identify their own areas for future research that will lead to improved instruction for students with CLBD and the supports they need to reach their goals. 

The contents of this website were developed under grants from the U.S. Department of Education, #H325H140001 and #H325190003. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Celia Rosenquist.

OSEP logo

Copyright 2018 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.